The late Prof. George Saitoti - former Finance
Minister and a beneficiary of the Goldenberg scam.
The death of George Saitoti in a helicopter crash on
June 10th 2012 removed one of the most important players in Kenya’s piranha pool
politics. Saitoti served as a senior minister in the presidencies of Daniel
arap Moi and Mwai Kibaki for more than 30 years, but he was more of an
executive prime minister than a political boss.
Although he was planning to run
for the presidency, his mixed parentage – Kikuyu and Masai – would never have
given him unqualified support among the Kikuyu in Kenya’s highly tribalised
politics, while the Masai are not numerous enough to be big political players.
Although Kenya’s professional classes may have voted for Saitoti, he was not a
populist speaker and would have stood no chance against Uhuru Kenyatta for the
Kikuyu vote.
According to Charles Hornsby author of Kenya: a History Since
Independence, “Saitoti was simply too reserved, distant, academic, and
non-tribal – and he didn’t have the common touch.”
A maths lecturer at Nairobi University who also
wrote an influential book on development, he was invited by President Moi to
become Finance Minister in 1983.
The end of the Cold War in the late 1990s
meant that Britain and other western donors could force multi party democracy
on Kenya and also move the economy from a highly regulated state managed model
to a free market.
Structural Adjustment accelerated that process but without
the aid needed to support the transition. It was introduced at the same time as
the one party state gave way to a multi-party democracy. Ironically, Kenya (the
African nation most favoured by the West) was one of the last to introduce a
multiparty system. Saitoti was a central figure in implementing both of these
fundamental changes.
Multi party democracy meant competition and that
meant Harambees to get the Wananchi to vote for the ruling party. Harambees are
open air rallies at which the Wananchi – the ordinary people – are persuaded by
the Big Men to vote for them. This means Nyama Choma (roasted meat), drink and
wads of cash for the people.
But how was KANU, the Kenya African National Union,
ruling party since independence, to raise money for Nyama Choma? The answer was
Goldenberg – an export promotion scheme whereby anyone who exported gold or
diamonds could claim 35 percent of their value as a state subsidy. The joke was
that Kenya has very little gold and no diamonds.
Payment for the scheme came under the consolidated
fund and therefore did not need parliamentary approval. But it did have to be
signed off and Saitoti, as Minister of Finance, did just that. He even extended
it. Whilst he may not have actually constructed Goldenberg, Saitoti implemented it, and almost certainly
benefitted from it personally.
Some £2 billion were stolen from the Kenyan state.
Most of the money went to individuals, Kamlesh Pattni who founded Goldenberg
International, and Gideon Moi, President Daniel arap Moi’s son. In all 487
companies, many set up just for the purpose, collected money from the scam. It
was the moment when corruption in Kenya became the norm in big businesses and the
upper echelons of state affairs. It was a moment when the corruption tick
became almost bigger than the state dog it fed on.
In a subsequent inquiry, Saitoti and Pattni were
named as culprits and Pattni was detained for a while. Then the whole affair
was quietly dropped. The election had been won, and some of Kenya’s richest
politicians, including Moi himself, were now multi-millionaires. No money was
returned. Later, some 23 senior judges were forced to resign as a result of
their involvement in the scandal. In a strange way the Kenyan state survived.
Throughout all of this Saitoti, as well as other
senior Kenyan politicians involved in the scam, were welcomed to London. This
was despite a former head of the Africa department of MI6 heading a forensic
investigation into where the Goldenberg money had gone. To the British and US
governments the strategic and economic importance of Kenya trumped corruption.
Kenya’s senior politicians became so wealthy that
politics became a game based on ‘eating’ and ‘feeding’ – stealing and spreading
the proceeds around an ethnic support base in return for votes. Appealing to
and buying tribal loyalty became the name of the game. Kenya is probably now
the most tribally divided nation in Africa. No wonder the 2007 election exploded
into such violence.
Will
it happen again?
With two tribalist leaders, Uhuru Kenyaata and
William Ruto, facing a trial at The Hague which may start in March 2013, the Kenyan election is wide
open. Victory will go to the person who builds an alliance of tribal leaders.
One thing is certain: Luo and Kikuyu will be on opposite sides. Raila Odinga,
the Luo leader, will run and elements among the Kikuyu will do anything to stop
him becoming president.
For a while I thought that in 2008 Kenyans had reached
the edge of the cliff and looked down. They wavered and pulled back. The
militants were called off by their paymasters. Kofi Annan was on hand to help.
Kenyans had seen a future that looked like hell and chose a fudged alliance of
enemies instead.
That alliance is now falling apart. The new
constitution has recreated a Kenya of 47 counties, whose elected governments
will be funded by the state to spend as they wish.
It is, however, likely that a local politician
from the dominant ethnic group in each county will be playing the ethnic card
to garner support.
In 2008 the main wars were in Nyanza Province
(Luoland) where (Kikuyu) police shot down Luo protesters, around Eldoret where
Kikuyu immigrants were burned out of their homes and murdered by Kalenjin, and
in Nairobi where battles took place in the poor slum areas between different
ethnic groups. If politicians play the ethnic card in the next election, this
winner-takes-all war could be fought in most of the new counties between any or
all of Kenya’s 40-odd ethnic groups.
Harambees are fund raising meetings...but you are right on the fact that they were used for political gains.And the 47 counties will receive only 15% of the national budget...divided in conformity with the county's individual needs...But they can generate their own income and spend under state watch and with state approval. Our politics are tribe based,...that was a card played by our 'founding fathers'. Now that attitude is entrenched, deep seated; and its reflected in our culture,...not just politics...We need more than just a new generation,..we need prayers.
ReplyDelete